“No science is immune to the infection of politics and the corruption of power.” –Jacob Bronowski
Politics is based on everything that science is not. Years of study are largely unnecessary. Politicians need only the ability to read and write 4 things: Yeah, Nay, their own signature, and the digits on the check they are receiving by lobbyists to alter their votes.
But what about facts?
Most people have never heard of the IPCC report, let alone the opening statement, the entirety of section 2 and much of section 6.1. Apparently, neither has Sarah Palin, possibly our future Vice President.
Sarah Palin isn’t sure of what caused global warming, “I’m not one to attribute every man — activity of man to the changes in the climate. There is something to be said also for man’s activities, but also for the cyclical temperature changes on our planet…. But there are real changes going on in our climate.”
Of course, she knows how to fix it. “What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts? We have got to clean up this planet…We have got to reduce emissions.” She manages to contradict her own statement only a sentence later. I’m still not sure what “positively affecting[ing] the impacts” of climate change is supposed to mean. Is that investing in flood insurance? Maybe buying land in Alaska?
Palin loves to tout the phrase “’drill, baby, drill.’” Not only would that take 10 years to get any benefit, but ironically, would occur after Palin would be out of office, leaving some other poor sap to deal with the issue of increased green house gasses levels.
The real question is not her beliefs. They are fairly obvious. The question is whether she knows about these issues, or if she is simply completely unaware of the realities. Many people have said many things about her qualifications. I’m not going to argue those. My question is about knowledge. Is it ignorance?